San Cesareo is experienced Administrative opacity
Opacity Administration
innovative and ingenious reinterpretation of the rules of administrative transparency
by the Institute Comprehensive San Cesareo (RM)
" Rankings access to kindergarten? stuff past, today we publish more .... see why "
So we talk about transparency in public administration, so many laws and regulations in place and in the barrel, but in the practical sense is that you preach Razzoli good but bad, very bad.
Many will have experienced the hard way a case of failure or partial administrative transparency, and between them there is a lot of myself that has run against a government in the municipality of San Cesareo. Specifically, the
'State Comprehensive School field to which the kindergarten. But things are not always as it seems, and it was just a trial innovative new forms of transparency??
you that the provisions have not been adequately implemented and that some governments (such as San Cesareo) there is a innovative vision and interpretation?
Let us understand, in fact you also help me by reading the experience that I am going to tell.
San Cesareo booming town on the outskirts of Rome, which in recent years has greatly increased the residents through the construction of large residential complexes.
think that the only complex where I live, have sprung up around 450 new dwellings for a population of at least 1500 people.
inevitable lack of facilities, especially schools, where they were not planned in advance.
But let's cut to the chase.
I have to enroll my child at nursery school having attained the age of 3 years (note that in previous years I had to pay out of my pocket money for a private nursery as there is in San Cesareo Communal nests).
The application form has the singular, here is the pseudo notice notice board (one and only document available to parents):
- Priority for the disabled and children of five and four years
- For children three years (born in 2006) these criteria priority ':
1. Residence
2. Disabilities
3. socio-economic and certified heavy
4. single-parent families
5. children of both parents working
6. date of birth
7. stato di famiglia
Ma i punteggi ? Roba passata e complicata, oggi ci sono i criteri di priorità, si da quindi preferenza ai bambini disabili ed ai bambini di cinque e quattro anni.
Uhm......già..ma in che ordine ? forse in quello riportato, ma non era più semplice dargli un peso, un punteggio ?
Voglio dire tra un bambino disabile ed uno di cinque chi ha la precedenza ? Il disabile voglio sperare. Ma quante domande mi pongo.....qui c'è gente che spreme le meningi e cerca la semplificazione ..... ancora non avevo realizzato il geniale progetto di sperimentazione...
Comunque il bello deve ancora venire leggete....
Per i bambini di tre anni (nati quindi nel 2006) , si darebbe precedenza a chi is a resident in second place in situations of disability ... but people with disabilities were not already benefit from the test above? What differences are not clear to me, are not so cute, but oh well I do not care so much, fortunately.
Which brings us to point 3 ... the most characteristic and already in the first place because I thought he was referring to a parameter related to family income, since I only work at home and having the whole family dependents (wife and two sons) thought it was a policy that could benefit me.
Too bad no one has been able to explain, such as the income limits, such as conditions for getting back in severe socio-economic conditions, such certification, it is impossible to know (I will understand this attitude then here you test the opacity Administrative holy god ... I was seriously embarrass the staff, but fared well)
After many, but many insistence, the dean of the Institute in a conversation which took place after the exclusion of my son told me that the situations known to the town hall and I was able to say more. E 'was good ... "opaque" to the end ...
easy to understand the 5th and 6th (I have obviously poorly written), the last one should do in my case, it is little known even to school. Well done!
"State of family "as they say .... there is no policy, no use.
Which is why there was no way to submit any additional documentation, if any certificate of employment of mothers. I have brought a certificate of family status, which at first would not accept because the institute ..... then taken considered useless for my insistence, saying "so we do not do anything ... oh well ... at most you there cleanse what you think ...
But beyond the rules, for the institute is much simpler, and that is where the concept is brilliant concrettizza Opacity Administration, the posts are few, continue to repeat, if the wife works there is some distant possibility, otherwise "lose hope ye who enter here."
then comes the day of the matt-lists, the end of April if I remember correctly, oh the memories fade become a bit dull ..... hell I want I'm also entering this vicious circle?
But this is not a canonical list, with the list in light of all children who applied, or the scores given criteria and details on the admission or non-admission.
Viva simplicity, the institute includes San Cesareo, were posted two waiting lists, one on the half-time and full time on showing the full names of children who were not admitted. The
I was there, in the middle of the list.
It is not to know how many children have been admitted, their names, their dates of birth, the scores / criteria for which they were admitted. Opacity 100%.
I asked if it was something temporary and if the list had yet to leave, I was told that this was the list and had not provided any other publication.
then write a letter to the manager of an institution Dr. Claudia Lupi, asking questions, underlining the unacceptability of such conduct and making a formal request for access to administrative documents.
few weeks later I went back to the institute and head for the lists, is not nothing changed. To my notes (they are very forgetful) I do some photography to that list and immediately hung up the pandemonium breaks loose. Comes up to me one of tizie who were on the ground floor to do something, and tells me that is not allowed.
Among other things, the photos are a bit faded out .. I wonder why ......
Wow I did not know that those lists were "secret", then call a travel manager can not remember the name, I think some school office, who introduces himself as Dr. "so and so" and ask me why I photographed and it's illegal to do so.
answer is that wanting to talk about illegal I could write a book about the way they have conducted the entire process of admission and I refuse to delete the photos as requested.
I asked the headmaster, I made this in my previous application (complete with a formal open registered A / R) and said it was not in my seat and I would contact her.
Mrs. Wolf contact me by phone a few weeks later, but my specific questions about the admission criteria fails to respond (see 3 and 7), however, tells me that the sticker is a provisional list and the final will be released soon.
Matt is not very safe ... you can can improve Dr. ...
I also said that the institute has applied to MUR (regional education office) for the establishment of an additional class and then the list would be updated after the response of the MUR. And here we have not, putting something up ... there will never be away should be opaque from the start ..... not to promise some sunshine but always hide in the darkness ...
ask a deadline for publication (we are already at the end of June, all the other schools in the rankings, those with capital G, is already published), I get a promise for early July.
Second Week of July, access to waiting lists is denied, those who try to enter into the hall of the Institute is stopped and questioned as to why you find them.
A request for access to list for the kindergarten, is told that the final lists will be posted in September.
Something is happening, then perhaps my protests have had an effect, the administration began to interact, albeit more obscure and cryptic ... but still I did not have the right key to ...
But how, I think ....... I started school in September?? And here I begin to realize that some strange project hovers over this story and I could be the star of a much bigger project of my poor understanding. I admit I also felt a bit silly not to have understood this before ..
So I go on vacation ..... waiting .....
In return, the 31/08/2009, I went to the institute and to my surprise well known that the lists are available, give the date of 25/08/2009 but the substance remains the same ... it is only ever lists expectations of even ranking the 'shadow'. In short, nothing has changed.
Um .... are increasingly confused as being a big brother ... that I ... that is the aim of the observed behavior and my movies and thoroughly investigated?
But it is the big brother government, a whimsical act interactive experiment to study the behavior of unsuspecting citizens in the face of new forms of expression of public administration.
'm sure there's a hand Brunetta, that he knows more of the devil ....
I hope that all is for the benefit of the community, at least my experience will be helped.
Meanwhile my request for access to administrative documents is beautiful and already expired, are in fact the 30 days that a government must respond to a request of this type.
document and I realized that I have every right to lodge a complaint for failure to official records.
I do not believe much in these actions, the citizen does not end with the check and never have everything to lose, unless the case does not become public, at least not obvious that any specific action to discredit the institution and / or persons involved in this story.
or until some flagrant act of protest is not perceived in the media.
But then if my intuition were true? If you really were a big experiment, innovative and ingenious reading of the rules of open government, the first case of institutional "Opacity Administration?
I ask you readers to help ....
vivalatrasparenza@libero.it
googol a bit this time, if we (Each a text at a time): 
